Insights

2401005_Misleading or Deceptive Conduct Claims o

Misleading or Deceptive Conduct Claims on Projects in Australia

A claim for misleading or deceptive conduct under s 18 of the Australian Consumer Law is one of the most commonly used causes of action in commercial litigation in Australia, including in disputes on major projects in mining, construction and infrastructure. Such claims can relate to conversations or meetings, courses of conduct between owners, operators, contractors and others, and the effect of any number of types and combinations of documents used on a project. 

A well-pleaded and argued case of misleading or deceptive conduct can be difficult and costly to defend, and the relief available to a successful party can be substantial. It can also present substantial challenges, and parties in mining, construction and infrastructure disputes often run into difficulties trying to adduce sufficient evidence to prove (or disprove): (i) the existence and meaning of an alleged misleading representation or conduct; or (ii) that the claimant suffered loss as a result of the conduct. 

This White Paper looks at the prevalence of misleading or deceptive conduct claims in project-related disputes and some of the challenges which commonly arise, and offers some key takeaways for parties navigating such claims.

Read the White Paper.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.