Insights

Despite Granting a Request for Rehearing, the PTAB Maintained Its Finding that Teva’s Copaxone Claims Were Unpatentable as Obvious, <i>PTAB Litigation Blog</i>

Despite Granting a Request for Rehearing, the PTAB Maintained Its Finding that Teva’s Copaxone Claims Were Unpatentable as Obvious, PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the Jones Day PTAB Litigation Blog.

In Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC v. Yeda Research & Development Co. Ltd., IPR2015-00643; -00644; -00830, the PTAB granted-in-part Patent Owner Teva’s request for rehearing of the Final Written Decisions finding every claim of the challenged patents obvious over the prior art.  In granting rehearing in part, the PTAB vacated its original decisions and concurrently entered modified Final Written Decisions maintaining that the challenged claims are unpatentable as obvious over the prior art.

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.