Insights

Prior Art Asserted in Second Petition Should Have

Prior Art Asserted in Second Petition Should Have Been Asserted in the First, PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog

The PTAB denied institution of a second inter partes review (“IPR”) petition filed by Aylo Freesites (“Petitioner”) after having previously instituted inter partes review of Petitioner’s first petition related to the same patent owned by DISH Technologies (“Patent Owner”).  Applying the “General Plastic factors,” the PTAB was unpersuaded by Petitioner’s attempts to justify the “two staggered petitions”—notably, the PTAB found that the challenged claim sets had “significant overlapping subject matter” and the Petitioner should have known of the primary reference cited in its second petition at the time it filed its first.  See  Aylo Freesites LTD, v. DISH Technologies L.L.C., IPR2024-00517, Paper 13 (August 7, 2024).

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.