Insights

Australia_Passes_Landmark_Scam_Prevention_SOCIAL

Australia Passes Landmark Scam Prevention Legislation

In Short

The Development: On 13 February 2025, the Australian Federal Parliament passed the Scams Prevention Bill 2025 (Cth) ("Bill"), the first of its kind worldwide. 

The Context: The Bill comes after the Australian government estimated that AUD $2.7 billion was stolen from Australian consumers via scams in 2023. The Bill will initially require local and overseas entities operating in the Australian banking, telecommunications, and digital platform services sectors to take reasonable steps to prevent, detect, disrupt, respond to, and report scams, and to document and implement internal governance mechanisms to combat scams, or risk penalties of up to AUD $50 million per offense. 

Looking Ahead: The Bill awaits Royal Assent (that is, being formally brought into law). While the sectors initially regulated by the Bill will be the banking, telecommunications, and digital platform services sectors, the treasury minister may designate additional sectors in the future. 

Australia's scam prevention legislation, the first of its kind worldwide, will be new Part IVF of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), and will impose consistent overarching principles ("SPF Principles"), sector-specific codes ("SPF Codes"), and other rules and governance obligations on entities operating in designated sectors. The Bill replaces existing approaches in operation across the Australian economy. 

The framework set forth in the Bill will apply to any corporation or person who carries on or provides a business or service that is part of a regulated (i.e., designated) sector. Regulated entities include entities not only engaging in trade or commerce based within Australia, but also based overseas. The treasury minister will formally confirm the banking, telecommunications, and digital platform sectors (and any others) as designated sectors via legislative instrument in due course. 

The Bill requires regulated entities to abide by sector-specific codes, and to comply with common principles, notably the requirement for an entity to take "reasonable steps" to prevent scams from reaching or impacting consumers. Additionally, the Bill requires a regulated entity to detect scams and suspicious activity, report credible scam intelligence to the coordinating regulator, and take "reasonable steps" to disrupt a scam and prevent losses to consumers. What is considered to be "reasonable" will depend on, among other things, the size of the regulated entity, the relevant services, and the consumer base of those services. 

Regulated entities will also need to provide an accessible mechanism for consumers to report scams or suspicious activity connected with the entity's business. The Bill does not prescribe a format for this mechanism; however, SPF Codes are likely to provide more detail on this issue.

In conjunction with external reporting obligations, the Bill includes internal governance requirements. A regulated entity will be required to document and implement corporate governance policies and procedures regarding the company's scam prevention, detection, disruption, response, and reporting measures, as well as develop and implement performance metrics and targets to measure the effectiveness of those governance measures. 

The Bill prescribes significant fines of up to AUD $50 million per offence if regulated entities do not take "reasonable steps" to report, disrupt, and respond to scams and attempted scams. Additionally, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission ("ACCC") (which will oversee and enforce the SPF Principles and the SPF Code applicable to the digital platforms sector), the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (which will oversee and enforce the SPF Code for the banking sector), or the Australian Communications and Media Authority (which will oversee and enforce the SPF Code for the telecommunications sector) may take corrective and enforcement action against regulated entities in breach of the new requirements. The powers available to the regulators via the Bill include judicially enforceable undertakings, injunctions, representative actions for damages, public warning notices, remedial directions, adverse publicity orders, declarations, and civil penalty proceedings. However, a 28-day safe-harbour provision is available for regulated entities that take good-faith and "reasonably proportionate" action to disrupt scams. 

The Bill also provides for internal and external dispute resolution mechanisms to allow individuals and small businesses affected by scams to seek redress from regulated entities that have not met their obligations. Affected consumers may also institute court proceedings to recover loss or damage, raising a potential risk of class actions. 

The ACCC has welcomed the passage of the Bill with the deputy chair, noting that "[i]ndividuals have been bearing the brunt of the responsibility to combat scammers for too long" and "[t]his Bill is a critical step in the fight against scams—creating overarching principles that all members of designated sectors must comply with. We know scammers will exploit weak links in the system—so these principles are key to a consistent approach".

The framework is a part of the Australian Labor Party's broader effort to modernize Australia's laws for the digital age and provide further consumer protections. Subject to the outcome of Australia's federal election later in 2025, the new framework may be the first of a number of reforms to Australia's privacy, payment systems, money laundering, cyber, product safety, unfair trading, and digital identification laws. 

Three Key Takeaways

  1. Given that banks, telecommunications companies, and digital platform service providers are expected to be designated first, domestic and international entities operating in these areas should begin reviewing their current strategies and frameworks to ensure that a governance framework is in place that satisfies the SPF Principles to prevent, detect, disrupt, respond to, and report scams and potential scams.
  2. The Australian government is modernizing its legislative regime and has demonstrated its intention to make fighting scams the responsibility of government and businesses. 
  3. Entities should expect further legislative reforms that continue to transfer the onus of consumer protection onto corporations, particularly in the digital space. We will continue to monitor these developments and publish further alerts in due course. 
Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.