Hashim M.Mooppan (Hash)

Experience Prior To Rejoining Jones Day

Collins v. Yellen/Mnuchin (S. Ct.): argued successfully in defense of statutory validity of multibillion dollar agreement between FHFA and Treasury and in opposition to unconstitutional restriction on President's authority to remove FHFA director.

Fulton v. Philadelphia (S. Ct.): argued successfully that municipal government's failure to accommodate religious practices of catholic foster care services organization violated Free Exercise Clause.

Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski (S. Ct.): argued successfully that claim for nominal damages satisfies Article III standing requirements.

House Judiciary Committee v. McGahn (D.C. Cir. en banc): argued in defense of landmark panel-stage victory that a chamber of Congress lacks authority to sue an Executive Branch official to enforce a legislative subpoena.

In re: Trump (4th Cir. en banc): argued in defense of unprecedented panel-stage victory that mandamus relief was available to reverse district court's refusal to certify interlocutory appeal in novel suit seeking to enforce the Emoluments Clauses against the President.

California v. Azar (9th Cir. en banc): argued successfully in defense of HHS rule restricting promotion of abortion within Title X program.

Hernandez v. Mesa (5th Cir. en banc): argued successfully that implied Bivens damages action is not available against federal law enforcement officer engaged in cross-border shooting.

Planned Parenthood v. Hodges/Himes (6th Cir. en banc): argued successfully in defense of Ohio law restricting state funding for organizations that perform abortions.

PHH Corp. v. CFPB (D.C. Cir. en banc): argued in opposition to unconstitutional restriction on President's authority to remove CFPB Director.

International Refugee Assistance Program v. Trump (4th Cir. en banc): argued in defense of presidential proclamation restricting travel from certain countries deemed to present security risks.

Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc. (2nd Cir. en banc): argued that Title VII's ban on sex discrimination does not encompass sexual orientation discrimination.

Guedes v. ATF (D.C. Cir.): argued successfully in defense of designation of Acting Attorney General under Federal Vacancies Reform Act.

Regents of Univ. of California v. U.S. DHS (9th Cir.): argued in defense of DHS rescission of DACA deferred-action policy.

Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (S. Ct.): briefed successfully that union-access regulation constituted per se physical taking.

Nestlé USA, Inc. v. Doe (S. Ct.): briefed successfully that aiding-and-abetting claim against domestic corporation under Alien Tort Statute was impermissibly extraterritorial.

Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (S. Ct.): briefed successfully that certain Arizona voting regulations do not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania (S. Ct.): briefed successfully that HHS had statutory authority under Affordable Care Act to exempt conscientious objectors from contraception mandate.

Kisor v. Wilkie (S. Ct.): briefed successfully that "Auer deference" doctrine should be significantly curtailed but retained in its core applications.

American Federation of Government Employees v. Trump (D.C. Cir.): briefed successfully that challenge to presidential executive order concerning federal sector unions must be channeled through Federal Labor Relations Authority.

In re: Federal Bureau of Prisons Execution Protocol Cases et al. (S. Ct.; D.C. Cir.; et al.): supervised briefing successfully defending against myriad civil suits that challenged 13 federal executions on various constitutional and statutory grounds.