![Professional headshots of six individuals, three men in the top row and two men and one woman in the bottom row, all wearing business attire and posing in front of different office and outdoor backgrounds.](/-/media/images/publications/2024/01/aggressive-in-the-endgame-the-us-bank-regulators-proposals-would-hike-bank-capital-the-review-of-banking--financial-serv/articleimage/gould_sterling_brownback_petraro_ali_mcmurray_soc.jpeg?rev=1f321483215e4916b9652b19ca9c0b99&la=en&h=800&w=1600&hash=AD012C8DE3FC6EAFD1C7AE4078C25F98)
Aggressive In The Endgame: The U.S. Bank Regulators’ Proposals Would Hike Bank Capital (The Review of Banking & Financial Services)
On July 27, 2023, the Federal banking agencies approved notices of proposed rulemaking to implement the remaining Basel III framework and to revise the methodology for calculating the G-SIB surcharge. The capital proposal will significantly increase required capital levels for covered banks and may have other less obvious and potentially unintentional consequences for the U.S. banking and financial system. It also eliminates any tailoring of the capital rules for banks with $100 billion or more in assets, almost entirely collapsing current Federal Reserve categories II, III, and IV into a single category, at least for capital purposes. In addition to the impact on regional banks, the proposals will drive significant capital increases for foreign banking organizations with significant U.S. presence, U.S. G-SIBs, and capital markets activities.
The agencies' failure to articulate a credible factual rationale for these far-reaching reforms, including their deviations from Basel and past publicly stated goals, leaves them vulnerable to policy and legal challenges.
Jonathan Gould, Josh Sterling, Nathan Brownback, Peter Petraro, Rubina Ali, and Locke McMurray contributed this article to The Review of Banking & Financial Services.