Insights

Director Vidal Reels In Discretionary Denials Und

Director Vidal Reels In Discretionary Denials Under Section 314(a), PTAB Litigation Blog

Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog

Under 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), the PTAB has discretion to deny institution of an inter partes review.  In certain circumstances, the PTAB will discretionarily deny a petition because another petition challenging the same patent was filed previously.  General Plastic Industries Co., Ltd. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha, IPR2016-01357, Paper 19 (PTAB Sept. 6, 2017).  The PTAB considers seven factors in making this discretionary determination, including the first factor:  “whether the same petitioner previously filed a petition directed to the same claims of the same patent.”  Id. at 16.  Applying these factors is not, however, “limited to instances when multiple petitions are filed by the same petitioner.”  Valve Corp. v. Elec. Scripting Prods., Inc., IPR2019-0062, Paper 11 at 2, 9 (PTAB Apr. 2, 2019) (precedential).  The General Plastic analysis may apply to unrelated subsequent petitioners if they have a “significant relationship” with the prior petitioner..  Id. at 9-10.

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.