Insights

SignificantReformsontheHorizonforSecurityo

Significant Reforms on the Horizon for Security of Payment in Victoria's Construction Industry

Like similar regimes in other States, the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (VIC) ("Victorian SOPA") was intended to reduce insolvency in the construction industry and enhance cash flow for subcontractors. Inconsistencies with other States and perceived deficiencies led to a parliamentary inquiry in March 2023, resulting in 28 recommended legislative reforms. On 17 October 2024, all of those recommendations received official support from the Victorian Government (in full, in part or in principle).  

The recommendations focus on bringing Victoria's regime into line with other States and simplifying the claims process. For example, the Victorian Government has supported recommendations to repeal the "excluded amounts" and "non-claimable variations" provisions that are unique to Victoria. Other significant recommendations include enabling adjudicators and courts to void notice-based time bars and other construction contract terms deemed to be "unfair". The proposed changes represent a significant widening of the scope of the Victorian SOPA to become very claimant friendly and, if adopted, will likely result in a significant increase in the use of the regime in Victoria. It is not yet clear when the recommendations will be formally considered for adoption, but reform is on the horizon.

Read the White Paper.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.