Insights

  • Home
  • Insights
  • District Court Grants Stay Post-Trial In View Of SAS, PTAB Litigation Blog

Share

District Court Grants Stay Post-Trial In View Of SAS, PTAB Litigation Blog

July 06, 2018 Blog

Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog.

The effects of SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S.Ct. 1348 (2018), continue to reverberate throughout the PTAB and federal district courts. In Prisusa Engineering Corp. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., No. 1:16-cv-21761-KMM (S.D. Fla. June 12, 2018) (Dkt. No. 368), the court ordered litigation stayed, post-trial, when the PTAB modified an IPR institution decision to include additional claims pursuant to SAS Institute.

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

You May Also Be Interested In

December 12, 2024 Firm Hosted

Women in IP Speaker Series: The 12 Days of Trademarks

November 20, 2024 Firm Hosted

Considerations For the Development and Licensing of Patent Portfolios

November 19, 2024 Blog

Don’t Wait To Seek Discovery Or It May Be Too Late, PTAB Litigation Blog

November 18, 2024 Alert

NIS 2 Directive: Transposition Period is Up for EU Member States

Before sending, please note:

Information on www.jonesday.com is for general use and is not legal advice. The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.