Insights

  • Home
  • Insights
  • District Court Grants Stay Post-Trial In View Of SAS, PTAB Litigation Blog

Share

District Court Grants Stay Post-Trial In View Of SAS, PTAB Litigation Blog

July 06, 2018 Blog

Visit the PTAB Litigation Blog.

The effects of SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 138 S.Ct. 1348 (2018), continue to reverberate throughout the PTAB and federal district courts. In Prisusa Engineering Corp. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al., No. 1:16-cv-21761-KMM (S.D. Fla. June 12, 2018) (Dkt. No. 368), the court ordered litigation stayed, post-trial, when the PTAB modified an IPR institution decision to include additional claims pursuant to SAS Institute.

Read the full article at ptablitigationblog.com.

You May Also Be Interested In

December 20, 2024 Alert

New Year, New Fees: USPTO Surcharges and Fee Increases for Trademark Filings in 2025

December 20, 2024 Blog

PTAB Reiterates Strict Evidentiary Standard for Printed Publications, PTAB Litigation Blog

December 19, 2024 Commentary

French CSPLA Report Highlights AI Regulation: Transparency and Copyright Compliance in Focus

December 19, 2024 Commentary

Trademark Scams 101: Common Signs of Scams and How to Avoid Them

Before sending, please note:

Information on www.jonesday.com is for general use and is not legal advice. The mailing of this email is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Anything that you send to anyone at our Firm will not be confidential or privileged unless we have agreed to represent you. If you send this email, you confirm that you have read and understand this notice.