Insights

ClassAction_ItalySpain_2301127_SOCIAL

Class Actions Worldview: Part II—Italy and Spain

Although class actions have been common in the United States for decades, they have not been as widely used in the rest of the world. The situation and risks remain in flux, however, as more countries have renewed momentum to enact class actions or class action-like procedures. Those procedures vary greatly among jurisdictions. Differences include how developed the procedures are; the types of claims parties can bring; the parties that can represent classes; whether classes are structured as opt-in or opt-out; and the rules governing settlement, remedies, and financing. Many countries have enacted more restrictive class procedures than the United States. There are notable exceptions, however, that present risks to defendants sued abroad.

In Part II of our series, we examine class actions activities in Italy and Spain. Italy is one of the frontrunners in the implementation of the EU Representative Action Directive, while Spain entitles third parties or groups of affected people to bring Collective Actions. This is the second installment of an in-depth, multipart series on class actions that will spotlight a wide array of jurisdictions worldwide.

Previously in series: Part I: The United States and the European Union. Upcoming in the series: Part III: Australia, Germany, and France; Part IV: China, Japan, Belgium, The Netherlands, and England and Wales.

Read the Guide here.

Insights by Jones Day should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information purposes only and may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the Firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request permission to reprint or reuse any of our Insights, please use our “Contact Us” form, which can be found on our website at www.jonesday.com. This Insight is not intended to create, and neither publication nor receipt of it constitutes, an attorney-client relationship. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Firm.
Contributors